So I have called twice about this and what do I have to say to get them to come out here?
I read this guys post. This is the SAME EXACT thing happening to me
http://forums.timewarnercable.com/t5/Connectivity/Internet-dropouts-reboots-T3-T4-timeouts/m-p/69615
Location: Matthews, 28105
My modem reboots like 5 times or more daily.
I have done research and you guys have helped me in the past, but I am seeing 55 upstream power level. Agent5x I believe had the same concern last time.
What the HECK do I have to say to get them out here?
Seriously I'm just upset with TWC.
Channel ID | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | |
Frequency | 555000000 Hz | 561000000 Hz | 567000000 Hz | 573000000 Hz | 579000000 Hz | 585000000 Hz | 591000000 Hz | 597000000 Hz | |
Signal to Noise Ratio | 37 dB | 38 dB | 37 dB | 37 dB | 38 dB | 37 dB | 38 dB | 38 dB | |
Downstream Modulation | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | |
Power Level
| -2 dBmV | -2 dBmV | -3 dBmV | -3 dBmV | -2 dBmV | -2 dBmV | -3 dBmV | -1 dBmV |
Channel ID | 6 |
Frequency | 24200000 Hz |
Ranging Service ID | 7115 |
Symbol Rate | 5.120 Msym/sec |
Power Level | 55 dBmV |
Upstream Modulation | [3] QPSK [1] 16QAM [2] 64QAM |
Ranging Status | Success |
Channel ID | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
Total Unerrored Codewords | 54191775 | 53343281 | 53332811 | 53350501 | 53324634 | 53326442 | 53327800 | 53342358 |
Total Correctable Codewords | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 19 | 15 | 20 |
Total Uncorrectable Codewords | 556 | 552 | 587 | 1517 | 2171 | 1477 | 1431 | 1561 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
Okay. I am very pleased with TWC now.
Two technicians came out and found nothing at first when looking on modem side. Then they took a reading from the splitter oustide and found noise. This was then isolated to a bad outlet on 1 of 2 TV coaxicals. This was creating ingress and causing the modem to reboot. I did some read and this can even be related to a neighbors wiring causing problems for everyone on that splitter. This sound terrifying because some people do stuff like this picture below I found on a site about ingess. LOL
(Note:THIS IS NOT MY PHOTO OR MY EQUIPMENT NOT TWC's EITHER )
Link: https://www.dslreports.com/faq/cabletech/3.1_Ingress
Now the modem levels look great!!!
So anyone else reading this having similar problems if you want to troubleshoot this on your own. I suggest replacing the connector on all coaxical cables.
Here's the new modem logs:
I had only 1 somtimes 4 bonded upstreams and I have seem the power level on up go as high as 57dB. Now its in the 30-45 range which I read is ideal. Even the downstream changed -3 -4 to -1 which 0 is ideal and range is -15 +15.
Thanks!
Channel ID | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | |
Frequency | 555000000 Hz | 561000000 Hz | 567000000 Hz | 573000000 Hz | 579000000 Hz | 585000000 Hz | 591000000 Hz | 597000000 Hz | |
Signal to Noise Ratio | 37 dB | 38 dB | 37 dB | 38 dB | 37 dB | 38 dB | 38 dB | 38 dB | |
Downstream Modulation | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | |
Power Level
| -2 dBmV | -1 dBmV | -2 dBmV | -2 dBmV | -1 dBmV | -1 dBmV | -1 dBmV | -1 dBmV |
Channel ID | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
Frequency | 24200000 Hz | 19400000 Hz | 30600000 Hz | 37000000 Hz |
Ranging Service ID | 6282 | 6282 | 6282 | 6282 |
Symbol Rate | 5.120 Msym/sec | 2.560 Msym/sec | 5.120 Msym/sec | 2.560 Msym/sec |
Power Level | 39 dBmV | 38 dBmV | 41 dBmV | 45 dBmV |
Upstream Modulation | [3] QPSK [1] 16QAM [2] 64QAM | [3] QPSK [2] 16QAM | [3] QPSK [1] 16QAM [2] 64QAM | [3] QPSK [3] 16QAM |
Ranging Status | Success | Success | Success | Success |
Channel ID | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
Total Unerrored Codewords | 37274996 | 36343954 | 36352847 | 36361826 | 36333850 | 36335024 | 36336757 | 36338015 |
Total Correctable Codewords | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 16 | 21 | 20 |
Total Uncorrectable Codewords | 552 | 1291 | 590 | 708 | 1529 | 1452 | 834 | 654 |
the high US and T3-4 errors and resets are probably not caused by ingress but by improper impedance at the splitter causing the isolation to vary. Splitters only provide rated isolation with proper 75 ohm loads and a noisy one upsets that.
Yes, a neighbor on the same tapoff can cause DS ingress, and anyone anywhere on the node can caus US ingress.
Glad this is fixed.
ps. I don't like seeing the 37 mHz upstream channel that high as compared to the 3 others, hopefully you won't have issues.
Mine look like this: yuck...
Channel ID | 34 | 33 | 35 | 36 |
Frequency | 24200000 Hz | 19400000 Hz | 30600000 Hz | 37000000 Hz |
Ranging Service ID | 15528 | 15528 | 15528 | 15528 |
Symbol Rate | 5.120 Msym/sec | 2.560 Msym/sec | 5.120 Msym/sec | 2.560 Msym/sec |
Power Level | 49 dBmV | 48 dBmV | 50 dBmV | 51 dBmV |
the DSL article is old and with digital qam systems, terminators must be used on all unused ports and as I've said many times, get rid of all unneeded splitters.
It also doesn't mention the strong rf fields generated by 4G phones which didn't exist in 2003 and now operate on the 699-866 channels.
Back in 2003, there was more analog ntsc tv on air, in 2013 all was gone and ATSC digital only. ATSC looks like noise and is harder to detect as ingress and does more damage to the qam signal.
Qam was invented 20 years before ATSC or 3g/4G cellular technology...